ShilikaTier-1 crypto media outreach and Web3 journalist relationship management. AI startup PR, enterprise blockchain media coverage, content writing services.
The fastest path to a Forbes byline is not a press release. It is six months of operating like the founder the Forbes reporter would want to put on the page. The press release is the last step, not the first.
This is the work that founders skip and PR people fake. The fake version produces one mention in CryptoSlate's news roundup, then nothing. The real version produces compounding coverage where one tier-1 placement lifts the next, the reporter starts emailing you when they need a quote, and your inbound becomes the warm version of what your outbound was a year ago.
I have spent six years running this loop across 50+ Web3 and AI protocols. The pattern is consistent enough that I can describe it as a system.
Tier-1 in this category is not just "outlets people have heard of." It is outlets with three properties:
By that definition, the tier-1 list in 2026 is:
Below this list is what I call "credibility tier-2": outlets that count for SEO and signal, do not count for moving the market. CryptoSlate, BeInCrypto, U.Today, AMBCrypto, CoinGape. Useful for volume, not for narrative.
The mistake most founders make is treating these tiers as a target list. They are not a target list. They are a relationship map.
Six steps, executed over four to six months. None of them are optional.
Step 1: read everything they have written in the last 12 months. Their angle, their stylistic preferences, the specific projects they have covered, the projects they have written critically about, the projects they have written about twice. This work takes 4 to 6 hours per reporter. Skip it and your first email reads like every other founder's first email.
Step 2: comment intelligently on three of their stories over six weeks. Twitter quote posts, LinkedIn comments, replies that add information rather than thank the reporter. The objective is for the reporter to see your name three or four times before you ever email them.
Step 3: send a context email with no ask. Specific reference to their work, a piece of useful intel they probably do not have, no pitch, no calendar link, no CTA. The end of the email is "happy to talk if useful, otherwise glad you are covering this beat." 80% of these emails go unanswered. The 20% that get a reply become real relationships.
Step 4: take the background call. When the reporter agrees to a 20-minute call, do not pitch. Brief them on the category, share your point of view, answer their questions, and leave with no commitment from them. This call is the inflection point. If it goes well, the reporter remembers you the next time they have a story in your category.
Step 5: offer help on stories you are not in. Sources, intros, market data, on-the-record commentary on competitors. Reporters keep a mental list of founders who help with stories. You want to be on that list before you ask for one of your own.
Step 6: pitch when you have actual news. Six months in, when you have a fundable announcement, the pitch is short and lands. "We are announcing X next Tuesday. Want the exclusive?" The answer is much more often "yes" than it would have been at month one.
This is slow. It is also the only model that produces compounding coverage. The fast model, mass press release distribution, produces one news roundup mention and zero relationships.
Treating journalist outreach as a system rather than a campaign:
This is not glamorous work. It also does not show up in any PR proposal deck. It is the work that separates the fractional senior operators from the agency teams that hand the relationship work to a junior account executive who cycles out of the firm before the relationship matures.
The model transfers cleanly to AI. The list is different.
For AI founders, the tier-1 list in 2026:
The relationship-building work is identical. The angles are different. Forbes AI wants the founder narrative and the product moat. The Information wants the technical architecture and the investor commentary. AI Magazine wants the deployment customer story. TechCrunch wants the funding number and the differentiation.
I run AI startup PR the same way I run Web3 PR: 6-month relationship build, segmented angles per outlet, embargo coordination on the announcement moment, and a 90-day sustained follow-up cycle.
The content writing question is downstream of the journalist relationship question. The right way to think about it:
The pattern across all four is that the writing is in the founder's voice, not the agency's. Ghostwriting that smells like ghostwriting is worse than no ghostwriting. The work product I ship looks like the founder wrote it on a slightly more disciplined Sunday afternoon than usual.
Content writing for Web3 and AI founders is structured as three productized offers so the cost is predictable: founder essay package, whitepaper sprint, op-ed of the month. The relationship work in the trade press is what makes the op-eds place. The op-eds are what make the founder citable when AI Overview, Perplexity, or ChatGPT generate answers about the category.
Enterprise blockchain is its own category and the playbook diverges from token-launch coverage. The audience is different: CIOs, procurement, compliance, and the analyst community.
The outlets that matter for enterprise blockchain:
The relationship work is similar but the timeline stretches. Analyst relations in enterprise tech runs on a quarterly briefing cycle. Each briefing is a 30 to 45 minute call covering company update, customer wins, product roadmap, and category outlook. Get on the analyst's briefing list and you are part of the next category report.
The mistake enterprise-blockchain founders make is running the campaign on the consumer-crypto cadence. Forbes Innovation does not run "we raised a Series A" the way Decrypt runs "we raised a Series A." Enterprise outlets run customer wins, category trends, and analyst commentary. Tune the calendar to the audience.
The teams that run this loop for a full year see the following pattern in month nine onward:
This is what I mean by compounding coverage. The relationship work in months one through six does not show up in metrics. The compounding shows up in months six through twelve and becomes the moat by month eighteen.
If you want a teardown of your current tier-1 outreach plan and a specific reporter shortlist for your stage and category, the booking link below is the fastest path.