Kinetic GoodsThe instinct when a team is struggling is to call more meetings. Alignment meetings. Sync meetings....
The instinct when a team is struggling is to call more meetings. Alignment meetings. Sync meetings. Working sessions.
The problem: more meetings create the illusion of progress without producing actual decisions.
What teams actually need is fewer decisions made faster — and more clarity about which decisions have been made.
Every unresolved decision creates debt. It sits in the background, consuming cognitive load. People second-guess themselves. Work gets paused. Momentum stalls.
The cost of one unresolved decision compounds. When you have ten decisions pending, you're not running a team — you're running a waiting room.
They name decisions explicitly.
Not "we'll revisit this" but "Decision: we will do X by Y date." Not "let's discuss" but "Decision owner: [name]. Deadline: [date]."
They close decisions.
When a decision is made, it gets documented. When it can't be made yet, the blocker gets named. "We can't decide on vendor until legal reviews the contract" is a useful decision state. "We'll figure it out" is not.
They distinguish decisions from discussions.
Discussions are inputs. Decisions are outputs. The meeting that was "really productive" but produced no decision didn't accomplish anything.
Before your next meeting, ask: "What decision does this meeting need to produce?"
If you can't answer that, cancel the meeting. Replace it with a document or a message.
The meeting isn't the work. The decision is.