Myke AnekeAlmost every developer depends on open source software every single day. Your frameworks, libraries,...
Almost every developer depends on open source software every single day.
Your frameworks, libraries, containers, security tools, machine learning stacks, and even operating systems are built on code shared openly by developers around the world.
Modern software simply wouldn’t exist without open source.
Yet there’s a paradox:
Most developers consume open source, but very few actively contribute back.
So the real discussion isn’t whether open source matters — it clearly does.
The discussion is:
What responsibility, if any, do we have toward the projects we rely on?
Open source isn’t just software you don’t pay for. It represents:
A developer anywhere in the world can improve tools used globally. Few industries allow this level of cooperation across borders.
Most successful projects follow the same pattern:
Which raises some uncomfortable questions:
Many developers think:
“If I’m not building features or fixing deep bugs, I’m not helping.”
But many projects grow through smaller contributions:
Sometimes better documentation helps more people than a new feature ever could.
Contributing also improves skills that are hard to learn in isolation:
Many experienced engineers credit open source contributions for accelerating their growth.
Here’s where opinions differ:
There isn’t a single correct answer.
But discussing these questions helps keep the ecosystem healthy.
Open source thrives because people choose to share, improve, and collaborate.
At some point, every developer decides:
Am I only a user, or also a participant?
Both roles are valid — but projects grow stronger when more users eventually become contributors.
Discussion time 👇
Curious to hear different perspectives.