Why Backtesting Returns Lie: 5 Overfitting Traps

# algorithmictrading# backtesting# overfitting# quantitativefinance
Why Backtesting Returns Lie: 5 Overfitting TrapsTildAlice

Your 47% Annual Return Probably Doesn't Exist I've seen dozens of backtests claim...

Your 47% Annual Return Probably Doesn't Exist

I've seen dozens of backtests claim double-digit monthly returns. Most vanish within weeks of going live. The problem isn't bad luck — it's that backtesting is designed to lie to you.

The uncomfortable truth: every feature you add, every parameter you tune, every threshold you test is another chance to fit noise instead of signal. Your 47% backtest return? It's probably measuring how well you memorized historical randomness.

Let me show you the five traps that turn promising strategies into expensive lessons.

Wooden Scrabble tiles spelling 'TRADING' against a rustic wood background.

Photo by Markus Winkler on Pexels

Trap 1: Look-Ahead Bias (The Time Travel Bug)

This one's subtle and deadly. You're using information that wouldn't have been available at the time you claim to be trading.

Classic example: using today's close to generate today's signal. In backtest land, you have the close price at 9:30 AM. In reality, you don't get it until 4:00 PM. By then, the opportunity is gone.

Here's what this looks like in code:


python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# WRONG: This leaks future data

---

*Continue reading the full article on [TildAlice](https://tildalice.io/backtesting-overfitting-traps/)*
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode