
Narnaiezzsshaa TruongAI isn't just displacing juniors. It's dissolving the substrate that seniority was built on. The real...
AI isn't just displacing juniors. It's dissolving the substrate that seniority was built on. The real question is whether seniors can evolve fast enough to meet what's coming.
The traditional ladder—junior → mid → senior—gave everyone a predictable story about how competence forms. It gave seniors a moral high ground ("I paid my dues"), a sense of earned authority, and a clear role in the ecosystem.
If they accept that AI is erasing the task-based apprenticeship layer, they must also accept:
That's a terrifying identity transition for people who built their self-worth on technical mastery rather than systems-level reasoning.
So they cling to the narrative that juniors are the ones being harmed. It's easier than confronting the fact that the senior role is mutating into something many of them are unprepared for.
It traps the whole community in nostalgia instead of adaptation.
Everyone loses because no one is naming the structural shift.
The senior role is not dying. It's evolving into something more demanding, more interdisciplinary, and more consequential.
The new senior is:
This is a different discipline entirely. It requires different training, different instincts, and different forms of apprenticeship.
And until the dev community recognizes that, we'll keep fighting the wrong battle.
If this framing resonates—or provokes—I'm building out a fuller framework on how governance, continuity, and verifiable intent reshape the engineering role. More at Substack.