
General EditorPictured above, HackerNoon Founder David Smooke speaking at a recent event in Saigon, “Writing,...
Pictured above, HackerNoon Founder David Smooke speaking at a recent event in Saigon, “Writing, Internet-ing, and Existing in the Age of AI”
What even is HackerNoon?
It started as a blogging platform, became known as a media company via the use of its own software, and is now launching a set of machine learning tools via its new site, HackerNoon AI. The multi-faceted approach feels natural if you remember the early days of platforms like Reddit, Twitter, or Digg, when the most innovative tech media companies defied existing categorization.
The tech world craves neat categories, but companies evolve. Slack started as a gaming company before revolutionizing workplace communication. Reddit began as a news aggregator and evolved into the internet's front page. Digg was the front page of the internet before it was resold 3 times and is now relaunching again sometime soon. Twitter was supposed to be a podcast platform before becoming the town square of the internet, and now it’s the X or Xai super app of some kind. The pattern holds: companies that last often morph into something completely different from their original vision.
HackerNoon, the developer-focused publishing platform serving 4+ million monthly readers, has been embracing this evolution thoughtfully. You'll find sharp tech articles from 45,000+ contributors—everything from "Building a Go Dependency Scanner From Scratch" to "VC Funding is Shifting from Gen-AI Apps to Deep Infrastructure" to “GOAT, Memes, and the Millionaire AI Agent.”
They're simultaneously competing with established tech publishers, building innovative AI tools, and powering 700+ websites through their content management system. They have 4M+ monthly visitors while staying profitable—no small feat in today's brutal media landscape. This is what smart strategy looks like in 2025.
HackerNoon's "Editorial Protocol" cuts through the noise where social media drowns in misinformation and deepfakes. Every story goes through both AI processing and human review—their "Second Human Rule"—creating a hybrid system that leverages automation while maintaining rigorous editorial accountability.
The AI handles the mechanical work: suggesting inline edits, possible viral headlines, generating images, checking for plagiarism, and optimizing for SEO and AEO. Human editors then review everything, make judgment calls about accuracy and relevance with the insights of AI, and ensure the content meets their quality standards. It's methodical blogging in a way that feels increasingly valuable on platforms where engagement metrics often trump truth.
This editorial philosophy feels particularly relevant as platforms like Twitter struggle with AI-generated spam, bot networks, and the rapid spread of fabricated content. While Twitter's verification system has become a pay-to-play credibility marker, HackerNoon's editorial process creates genuine trust signals.
The platform can translate content into 76 languages automatically and generate audio versions that significantly boost engagement, with the human oversight layer ensuring these features serve readers rather than just algorithms. Their domain authority of 88 reflects not just process optimization, but the consistent quality that comes from actual editorial standards—something increasingly valuable as AI-generated content floods our internet results.
The approach here reflects excellent platform design and strategic thinking. Most media companies buy their tech stack; HackerNoon builds theirs and open-sources it. Their React-based markdown editor and Quill based text editor are both open sourced and available on GitHub, along with their pixel icon library, which has 10k+ downloads, and a browser extension that removes paywalls—reflecting their genuine commitment to an open internet.
This strategy has delivered impressive results. HackerNoon now powers 700+ additional tech sites through their CMS, from Computational to Media Bias to Text Models. Rather than just licensing software, they're building specialized communities around specific tech topics. It's infrastructure development that directly serves their editorial mission rather than distracting from it.
The community aspect becomes especially valuable in the context of Twitter's transformation. As Twitter/X has become increasingly dominated by algorithmic manipulation and paid amplification, developer communities have been actively searching for alternatives that prioritize signal over noise. HackerNoon's approach—combining editorial oversight with community contribution—offers an excellent middle path between the chaos of unrestricted social media and the gatekeeping of traditional tech journalism.
Their blockchain integration—backing up every story on Arweave and Sia—serves their editorial mission by creating a permanent, tamper-proof record of published content in an era of information manipulation and retroactive editing. It's practical implementation of decentralization principles rather than mere technologist excess.
HackerNoon's business model offers a refreshing alternative to the engagement-driven economics dominating social media. Their revenue comes from "Business Blogging" (tech companies publishing technical docs, blog posts, press releases, and announcements), banner ads starting at $5,000 per week, sponsored writing contests, and newsletter sponsorships across 22 technology verticals. As CEO, David Smooke details in their annual "State of the Noonion" report, revenue grew 22% year-over-year while expenses dropped 28%, achieved through smart operational improvements and a leaner team rather than growth-at-all-costs scaling. Their investment in proprietary technology and direct reader relationships has created stability against platform policy changes that have disrupted other media businesses. HackerNoon has maintained focus on thoughtful, longer-form content that genuinely serves its developer, web3, and community. This difference in approach has become more valuable over time, not less.
HackerNoon has built multiple complementary capabilities that reinforce each other beautifully. The editorial standards enhance the AI tools; the AI tools improve the publishing platform; the publishing platform generates insights that strengthen both. It's systems thinking applied to media in a way that feels particularly smart as traditional social platforms struggle with content quality.
"We were publishing the founder of Hugging Face back when they were just building a chatbot and we were publishing the Vercel team when they were called Zeit," said HackerNoon Founder David Smooke via email, "We've been around the block and again we need to keep reinventing ourselves. The off the shelf AI available now dwarfs what was available when I founded HackerNoon in early 2013, and what AI comes next, only time will tell as we integrate with the times.”
This track record of spotting talent and trends early gives weight to their current approach. While social media has largely abandoned content moderation in favor of algorithmic amplification, HackerNoon has strengthened editorial processes that can thrive in an AI-saturated information environment.
In an era when AI can generate convincing content, platforms with strong editorial standards matter more than ever. HackerNoon's approach stands out in the broader context of quality information online. They compete based on editorial quality, technical depth, and community trust.
They're building better tools for the developer community they've always served, and, true to their tagline, "how hackers start their afternoons," they maintain a consistent identity even as their methods evolve. Traditional outlets are slow to adopt AI, while AI-native platforms struggle with accuracy. HackerNoon uses AI for efficiency but keeps human editors in charge, bridging the gap between speed and accuracy.
The future of tech media will likely incorporate HackerNoon’s key insight: that editorial quality and technological innovation enhance rather than undermine each other.