
maria tzanidakiObsessing over ticket velocity misses the point, but benchmarks may exist. Why...
Obsessing over ticket velocity misses the point, but benchmarks may exist.
Raw count is misleading:
Reality check: 1 ticket/day (5/week) is a sustainable pace; spikes to 10+ during bug triage weeks are normal but unsustainable.
DevOps-specific: Infrastructure tickets may take longer especially if there is more than one team involved in decision making.
Too Big (>1 week): Split → Epic → Stories → Tasks
Too Small (<4 hours): Batch into 1-day tickets
Just Right: 1-3 days each → 2-5/week sustainable
Teams breaking work into 1-day tasks can hit 25 tickets/week/team.
Juggling 3+ tickets/day wastes 40% of productivity. Focus deeply on 1-2 at a time.
Low velocity (<3/week):
High but fragile (>12/week):
5-8 quality tickets/week + deploy frequency >weekly + low rework rate = healthy velocity.
Good engineers optimize for impactful velocity (deployed value/week), not raw ticket count.
What matters more:
Focus on sustainable throughput with quality—not vanity metrics.
I took a look on scrum.org to elaborate my thoughts on this : https://www.scrum.org/scrum-kanban
https://www.scrum.org/forum/scrum-forum/31862/story-points-complexity-vs-effort